PER DIEM LOOK-UP
1 Choose a location
OR
OR
Rates for Alaska, Hawaii, and U.S. territories and possessions are set by the Department of Defense.
Rates for foreign countries are set by the Department of State.
An official website of the United States government
Here’s how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock
( )
or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
November 16, 2023, 1 p.m.- 3 p.m. Eastern time
Virtual location: Zoom
ALLOTTED TIME |
TOPIC |
PRESENTER |
---|---|---|
1:00-1:05 p.m. |
Call to order |
Designated Federal Officer Michelle White |
1:05-1:10 p.m. | Chair remarks | Federal Secure Cloud Advisory Committee Chair Ann Lewis |
1:10-1:30 p.m. | Committee question-and-answer | Office of Management and Budget and FSCAC members |
1:30-1:40 p.m. | Public comment (limit of three minutes per speaker) | Members of the public |
1:40-2:15 p.m. | Committee discussion: Draft OMB memo feedback | FSCAC members |
2:15-2:50 p.m. | Committee memo finalization | FSCAC members |
2:50-2:55 p.m. | Committee vote | FSCAC members |
2:55-3:00 p.m. | Closing remarks and adjourn | FSCAC Chair Ann Lewis and DFO Michelle White |
Michelle White, FSCAC DFO, reviewed the purpose of the meeting and described the duties of the committee. She completed a roll call and determined that a quorum had been established. She reviewed the agenda of the meeting and announced that there will also be an open forum after the committee’s question and answer agenda item for questions from the public with three minutes allotted for each speaker.
Ann Lewis, FSCAC Chair, provided opening remarks. She stated the desired outcome of the meeting was to develop and deliver to the GSA Administrator, a one-page summary of the Committee’s feedback on the draft OMB FedRAMP Memo. She also shared that any technical questions not answered in today’s meeting will be captured, addressed, and communicated back to the Committee and posted on the Committee’s website.
The committee welcomed comments from members of the public. Three members of the public provided comments all related to the draft deliverable and recommendations the Committee have been discussing. Attendees raised their hands to be called on and highlighted specific recommendations the Committee should consider which included: focusing on reducing friction for sponsorship, reducing costs for CSPs to receive an authorization, increasing intensity of pen-testing, and providing agencies with the best view of a system’s security posture. Eric Mill introduced himself and provided additional clarity around the draft OMB FedRAMP memo. Specifically, he stated that OMB will be extending the public comment period, and the exact date will be provided in the Federal Register at a later time, but expected to be in December.
Eric then opened up the floor for questions from the FSCAC membership. Some of the main questions sought additional clarification on definitions listed in the memo, the new authorization paths and continuous monitoring processes, roles and responsibilities of stakeholders, and the timeline for execution.
The committee welcomed comments from members of the public. There were no public comments.
Michelle White, FSCAC DFO, provided an overview of the process and the topics for discussion and called on members as they raised their hands to provide their input, which was directly captured live during the meeting in the draft FSCAC letter to the GSA Administrator. Ann Lewis, FSCAC Chair, led the discussion to further improve and refine the draft letter summary.
FSCAC members provided additional input in the summary. Individual comments submitted prior to the meeting were captured in the appendix. Branko Bokan clarified that the comments included do not represent all FSCAC members and proposed a clarifying statement to include. Additional summary sections and bullets were added in the areas of standards/process changes, small business concerns, budget implications, potential benefits, items missing from the draft OMB memo, and clarifications needed from the draft OMB memo.
The Committee continued their deliberations and discussion. Membership further refined, edited, and finalized the draft FSCAC letter to the GSA Administrator to prepare it for a Committee vote.
Michelle reviewed the voting procedures. Ann Lewis made a motion to approve the deliverable as it is written and deliver it to the GSA Administrator by November 20, 2023. Bo Berlas, seconded the motion. A roll call vote was completed with the majority in favor of the motion.
Ann thanked everyone for joining the meeting, taking the time, and providing their expertise. Michelle
adjourned the meeting at 3:00 p.m.
Error, The Per Diem API is not responding. Please try again later.
No results could be found for the location you've entered.
Rates for Alaska, Hawaii, and U.S. territories and possessions are set by the Department of Defense.
Rates for foreign countries are set by the Department of State.
Rates are available between 10/1/2022 and 09/30/2025.
The End Date of your trip can not occur before the Start Date.
Traveler reimbursement is based on the location of the work activities and not the accommodations, unless lodging is not available at the work activity, then the agency may authorize the rate where lodging is obtained.
Unless otherwise specified, the per diem locality is defined as "all locations within, or entirely surrounded by, the corporate limits of the key city, including independent entities located within those boundaries."
Per diem localities with county definitions shall include"all locations within, or entirely surrounded by, the corporate limits of the key city as well as the boundaries of the listed counties, including independent entities located within the boundaries of the key city and the listed counties (unless otherwise listed separately)."
When a military installation or Government - related facility(whether or not specifically named) is located partially within more than one city or county boundary, the applicable per diem rate for the entire installation or facility is the higher of the rates which apply to the cities and / or counties, even though part(s) of such activities may be located outside the defined per diem locality.