Skip to main content

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

GSA Logo U.S. General Services Administration
    • Explore buy through us
    • Category management
    • Government property for sale or lease
      Toggle submenu
      • Personal property (tangible goods)
      • Real property (real estate and buildings) for public use
      • Real property sales
      • Vehicle sales
    • Products and services
      Toggle submenu
      • Human capital
      • Industrial products and services
      • Office management
      • Professional services
      • Security and protection
      • Transportation and logistics services
    • Purchasing programs
      Toggle submenu
      • Assisted acquisition
      • Commercial platforms
      • Emergency acquisition basic ordering agreements
      • Federal strategic sourcing initiative
      • Fleet management
      • HCaTS and HCaTS SB
      • OASIS and OASIS SB
      • Requisition programs
      • State and local programs
    • Shared services
      Toggle submenu
      • Payroll services
      • Support services for CABs

    Featured Topics

    • Multiple Award Schedule Governmentwide contracts for products and services at volume discount pricing.
    • Auctions Federal assets available via auction to the general public.
    • Explore sell to government
    • Step 1: Learn about government contracting
      Toggle submenu
      • Ways you can sell to government
      • How to access contract opportunities
      • Conduct market research
    • Step 2: Compete for a contract
      Toggle submenu
      • Register your business
      • Certify as a small business
      • Become a schedule holder
      • Market your business
      • Research active solicitations
      • Respond to a solicitation
      • What to expect during the award process
    • Step 3: Manage your contract
      Toggle submenu
      • Comply with contractual requirements
      • Handle contract modifications
      • Monitor past performance evaluations

    Featured Topics

    • Contract opportunities on SAM.gov Search current federal contract opportunities and procurement notices.
    • Forecast of contracting opportunities Anticipated contracts offered by GSA.
    • Vendor support center Research the federal market, report sales, and upload contract information.
    • Explore real estate
    • Design and construction
      Toggle submenu
      • 3D-4D building information modeling
      • Computer-aided design standards
      • Engineering
      • Project management information system
      • Prospectus thresholds
    • Facilities management
      Toggle submenu
      • Security
      • Tenant services
      • Water quality management
    • Our properties
      Toggle submenu
      • Owned and leased properties
      • Regional buildings
      • Renting property
    • Real estate services
      Toggle submenu
      • Leasing
      • Real property disposal
      • Reimbursable services (RWA)
      • For businesses seeking opportunities
      • For workers in federal buildings
      • Voice of the customer
    • Workplace optimization
      Toggle submenu
      • Commercial coworking
      • Federal coworking

    Featured Topics - Real Estate

    • Historic preservation tools and resources Procedures for maintaining and repairing historic buildings.
    • Real property disposal Dispose or acquire excess federal real property including buildings or land.
    • Explore policy and regulations
    • Acquisition management policy
    • Aviation management policy
    • Information technology policy
    • Real property management policy
    • Relocation management policy
    • Travel management policy
    • Vehicle management policy
    • Regulations
      Toggle submenu
      • Federal acquisition regulations
      • Federal management regulations
      • Federal travel regulations

    Featured Topics

    • Forms Search for a government form.
    • Per diem FAQs Frequently asked questions about per diem rates and related topics.
    • Explore small business
    • Small business goals
    • Register your business
      Toggle submenu
      • Explore business models
      • Research the federal market
      • Subcontracting and other partnerships
    • Forecast of contracting opportunities
    • Small business resources
      Toggle submenu
      • Small business contacts
      • Small business events
      • Videos

    Featured Topics

    • Forecast tool Information on planned federal contracting opportunities.
    • Socio economic categories Check your eligibility for small-business set-asides.
    • Training resources Suggested training for doing business with us.
    • Explore travel
    • Plan a trip
      Toggle submenu
      • Per diem rates
      • Transportation (airfare rates, POV rates, etc.)
      • Lodging
      • Travel charge card
    • Travel and lodging services
      Toggle submenu
      • E-gov travel service (ETS)
      • Rideshare
      • Travel category schedule
    • Federal travel regulation

    Featured Topics

    • Per diem rates look-up Allowances for lodging, meal and incidental costs while on official government travel.
    • Mileage reimbursement rates Reimbursement rates for the use of your own vehicle while on official government travel.
    • Explore technology
    • Build websites and digital services
    • Purchasing programs
      Toggle submenu
      • Cloud computing services
      • Cybersecurity products and services
      • Governmentwide acquisition contracts
      • MAS information technology
      • USAccess
    • Government initiatives
      Toggle submenu
      • Artificial Intelligence
      • Cybersecurity
      • Emerging citizen technology
      • FedRAMP
      • Federal identity, credentials, and access management
      • Robotic process automation community
      • Technology modernization fund
    • Training

    Featured Topics

    • Challenge.gov Government sponsored challenges and prize competitions.
    • Data.gov Access U.S. government data.
    • Multiple award schedule IT category Information technology products, services and solutions.
    • Explore about us
    • Background and history
      Toggle submenu
      • Overview
      • Mission and strategic goals
      • Role in presidential transitions
    • Careers
      Toggle submenu
      • Get an internship
      • Launch your career
      • Elevate your professional career
      • Discover special hiring paths
      • Resources and related links
    • Events and training
      Toggle submenu
      • Our training programs
    • Newsroom
      Toggle submenu
      • Agency blog
      • Congressional testimony
      • GSA does that podcast
      • News releases
      • Speeches
      • Videos
    • Organization
      Toggle submenu
      • Leadership directory
      • Federal Acquisition Service
      • Public Buildings Service
      • Staff offices
    • Regions
      Toggle submenu
      • Region 1 | New England
      • Region 2 | Northeast and Caribbean
      • Region 3 | Mid-Atlantic
      • Region 4 | Southeast Sunbelt
      • Region 5 | Great Lakes
      • Region 6 | Heartland
      • Region 7 | Greater Southwest
      • Region 8 | Rocky Mountain
      • Region 9 | Pacific Rim
      • Region 10 | Northwest/Arctic
      • Region 11 | National Capital Region
    • Contact us

    Featured Topics

    • Blog Read the latest GSA news, updates and analysis.
    • Careers Learn what we have to offer.
  • Per diem lookup
Buy through us
Explore buy through us
Category management
Government property for sale or lease
Personal property (tangible goods)
Real property (real estate and buildings) for public use
Real property sales
Vehicle sales
Products and services
Human capital
Industrial products and services
Office management
Professional services
Security and protection
Transportation and logistics services
Purchasing programs
Assisted acquisition
Commercial platforms
Emergency acquisition basic ordering agreements
Federal strategic sourcing initiative
Fleet management
HCaTS and HCaTS SB
OASIS and OASIS SB
Requisition programs
State and local programs
Shared services
Payroll services
Support services for CABs
Sell to government
Explore sell to government
Step 1: Learn about government contracting
Ways you can sell to government
How to access contract opportunities
Conduct market research
Step 2: Compete for a contract
Register your business
Certify as a small business
Become a schedule holder
Market your business
Research active solicitations
Respond to a solicitation
What to expect during the award process
Step 3: Manage your contract
Comply with contractual requirements
Handle contract modifications
Monitor past performance evaluations
Real estate
Explore real estate
Design and construction
3D-4D building information modeling
Computer-aided design standards
Engineering
Project management information system
Prospectus thresholds
Facilities management
Security
Tenant services
Water quality management
Our properties
Owned and leased properties
Regional buildings
Renting property
Real estate services
Leasing
Real property disposal
Reimbursable services (RWA)
For businesses seeking opportunities
For workers in federal buildings
Voice of the customer
Workplace optimization
Commercial coworking
Federal coworking
Policy and regulations
Explore policy and regulations
Acquisition management policy
Aviation management policy
Information technology policy
Real property management policy
Relocation management policy
Travel management policy
Vehicle management policy
Regulations
Federal acquisition regulations
Federal management regulations
Federal travel regulations
Small business
Explore small business
Small business goals
Register your business
Explore business models
Research the federal market
Subcontracting and other partnerships
Forecast of contracting opportunities
Small business resources
Small business contacts
Small business events
Videos
Travel
Explore travel
Plan a trip
Per diem rates
Transportation (airfare rates, POV rates, etc.)
Lodging
Travel charge card
Travel and lodging services
E-gov travel service (ETS)
Rideshare
Travel category schedule
Federal travel regulation
Technology
Explore technology
Build websites and digital services
Purchasing programs
Cloud computing services
Cybersecurity products and services
Governmentwide acquisition contracts
MAS information technology
USAccess
Government initiatives
Artificial Intelligence
Cybersecurity
Emerging citizen technology
FedRAMP
Federal identity, credentials, and access management
Robotic process automation community
Technology modernization fund
Training
About us
Explore about us
Background and history
Overview
Mission and strategic goals
Role in presidential transitions
Careers
Get an internship
Launch your career
Elevate your professional career
Discover special hiring paths
Resources and related links
Events and training
Our training programs
Newsroom
Agency blog
Congressional testimony
GSA does that podcast
News releases
Speeches
Videos
Organization
Leadership directory
Federal Acquisition Service
Public Buildings Service
Staff offices
Regions
Region 1 | New England
Region 2 | Northeast and Caribbean
Region 3 | Mid-Atlantic
Region 4 | Southeast Sunbelt
Region 5 | Great Lakes
Region 6 | Heartland
Region 7 | Greater Southwest
Region 8 | Rocky Mountain
Region 9 | Pacific Rim
Region 10 | Northwest/Arctic
Region 11 | National Capital Region
Contact us
  1. Home
  2. Real estate
  3. GSA Properties
  4. Inflation Reduction Act
  5. LEC program details
  6. Material requirements FAQs

Material requirements FAQs

Last updated: May 7, 2025

Overview

The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA), Pub. L. No. 117-169, was enacted in August 2022.

Consistent with standard GSA practice and the Federal Acquisition Regulation, and having taken public input and pilot program experience into consideration, GSA developed material requirements that meet the agency’s needs in entering contracts funded under GSA’s IRA LEC program. These materials help advance Administration priorities such as right-sizing the Federal real property portfolio, creating jobs and prosperity at home, supporting domestic mining and processing of non-fuel minerals, strengthening supply chains for the U.S. and its allies while reducing the global influence of malign and adversarial states, and promoting market competition, economic growth, and U.S. manufacturing innovation.

GSA has established material requirements for key construction materials including asphalt, concrete, glass and steel. Construction product assemblies (such as window assemblies or rebar-reinforced concrete) qualify for IRA funding if at least 80% of the assembly’s total cost or total weight comprises materials that meet the requirements.

An asterisk (*) at the end of any question indicates it is new or revised as of December 2023.

General

1. Why did GSA establish IRA LEC Material Requirements?

GSA launched the first nationally-applicable environmental product declaration requirements for concrete and asphalt in March 2022. Those requirements included global warming potential limits for real-estate/gsa-properties/inflation-reduction-act/lec-program-details/material-requirements-faqs, and were added to the Facilities Standards for Public Buildings Service (P100) that apply to all GSA projects. As a follow-on specific to its IRA-funded material purchases, GSA strengthened its concrete and asphalt requirements, and added new ones for glass and steel.

GSA’s IRA LEC Material Requirements comply with IRA Section 60503, which provides funding for materials with “substantially lower levels of embodied greenhouse gas emissions … as compared to estimated industry averages for similar materials and products.”

2. Have GSA’s IRA LEC material requirements changed from the interim requirements issued in May 2023?*

Following implementation of the low embodied carbon material Pilot Program, GSA’s IRA LEC Material Requirements remain largely unchanged since the pilot commenced in May 2023.

The GWP limits remain the same because market research suggests there have not been dramatic shifts in the GWP of products, nor new industry-wide EPDs, in these four material categories over the past six months. Also, consistency in these initial stages helps promote market certainty among manufacturers about whether investments will enable their products to qualify for GSA’s IRA funding.

The only substantial change is clarifying the definition of glass material assemblies. Standardizing on the insulating glass unit, also called IGU, will yield consistency in applying the “80/20” assembly rule from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Interim Determination [PDF]. (At least 80% of IGU weight must be compliant flat glass).

3. What other concurrent/complementary actions are being led by other agencies that can influence GSA’s work?*

GSA may reevaluate these requirements after the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration releases GWP limits for its IRA-funded low-carbon transportation materials. FHWA is expected to release additional details about its program in Winter 2023–2024.

GSA may consider prospectively harmonizing its IRA GWP limits with FHWA and efforts led by other federal agencies, such as EPA’s grant program to support more robust EPDs, and EPA’s upcoming labeling program for low-carbon construction materials.

4. Is there a schedule for updating GSA’s IRA LEC Material Requirements?*

GSA may revise these requirements based on: ongoing lessons learned from broader implementation; substantially-changed industry averages based on product-specific and/or industry-wide EPDs; updated determinations from the EPA on IRA Section 60503-qualifying materials; and/or opportunities to align with other federal and state agencies’ collaborative industry engagement. Because GSA cannot anticipate these potential developments or their timing, GSA has not committed to a schedule for an update, if any.

Any revisions will only apply prospectively to contracts awarded after updated GSA Requirements are issued, and will not retroactively change active projects’ contractual terms or conditions.

5. Is an EPD required for all materials and products funded under IRA Section 60503? When?*

Yes. The EPA Interim Determination states that an EPD is required to identify the material/product-specific GWP. A material/product qualifies for GSA IRA LEC funding if its GWP reported in the EPD is lower than the GSA IRA limit(s) incorporated into each contract.

A product-specific Type III (third-party verified) EPD must be provided to GSA at the time of bid, or before construction notice to proceed is issued, depending on what is indicated in project-specific solicitations and contract documents. Materials must be accompanied by a compliant EPD to be purchased using IRA LEC funding.

6. How does the Buy American Act apply?

GSA’s IRA LEC Materials Requirements build on the continued application of existing laws such as the Buy American Act of 1933, the Build America, Buy America Act, which mostly applies to grant programs (enacted as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021), and the Trade Agreements Act of 1979. All materials and products procured for GSA projects must comply with these laws.

For IRA Section 60503-funded procurements, existing trade-related laws will be applied first, before applying GSA’s IRA LEC Material Requirements.

Data specificity

7. Why is GSA focused on the data specificity of EPDs?*

More specific data on material production — such as where raw materials were sourced and transported from, and how they were processed — provides transparency and more reliable information on environmental impacts of materials and products. Actual data from the plant(s) that manufacture inputs within a specific supply chain increases a reported GWP’s certainty. GSA therefore requests facility-specific, supply chain-specific EPDs where available.

More data certainty better-informs material selection decisions, and mitigates the risk of selecting a higher-GWP product due to insufficient transparency into its supply chain emissions.

8. Is GSA still interested in accounting for varying levels of data specificity in EPDs?*

Yes. GSA strongly supports additional supply chain-specific data in EPDs, to base decisions on the best-available information.

9. Could product category rules (PCR) require more specific data in EPDs?

Yes. Based on the feedback GSA received from domestic manufacturers, local suppliers, small businesses, and environmental and labor groups, GSA recognizes that PCR improvements are an ideal way to require greater transparency (e.g. supply chain-specific data) in EPDs.

GSA supports PCRs that can yield high-quality EPD data, including but not limited to supply-chain specific data and recycled content details.

To help promote robust EPDs, GSA has joined relevant product category rule (PCR) committees. This enables the agency to partner with industry to promote PCRs that result in EPDs that are more comparable, with higher-quality data, and greater reliability for use in procurement.

10. Why does GSA require a product-specific Type III EPD (with facility-specific data, including for the supply chain’s associated unit processes, where feasible)?

GSA’s EPD requirements accord with EPA’s Interim Determination.

Facility-specific data on the supply chain’s associated unit processes enhances transparency, increases reliability, and allows more fair and accurate comparisons of product-level data.

EPDs using industry average or generic data may not reflect the environmental indicators associated with the plant(s) that manufactured inputs for a particular product’s supply chain.

Global warming potential limits

11. How were GSA’s IRA GWP limits established?

Pursuant to EPA’s Interim Determination, GSA determines “quintile” (20% range) GWP thresholds “using data from a verified source (e.g., an open source EPD database, industry-wide EPDs or a 3rd party-verified LCA [life cycle assessment] developed using the relevant PCR).”

GSA’s GWP limits are based on industry average EPDs and actual products’ publicly-available EPD data, filtered by material type, PCR(s) specified in GSA’s Requirements, North American geographical scope, and EPD validity dates of January 1, 2022 or later.

The PCR(s) reflected in each product category are shown in GSA’s IRA LEC material requirements.

12. Is GSA considering region-specific GWP limits?

GSA’s IRA GWP limits apply to all the agency’s IRA Section 60503-funded purchases in covered product categories. The limits are based on data availability for the region of North America, from sources allowed under EPA’s Interim Determination: (a) an open-source EPD database; (b) industry-wide EPDs; or (c) a 3rd party-verified LCA developed using the relevant PCR.

The agency recognizes that the average GWP of materials like concrete and asphalt may vary by location. If or when adequate region-specific data is available (e.g. from EPDs), GSA may establish region-specific GWP limits for certain materials.

13. Is GSA considering global GWP limits?

No. GSA uses North American manufacturing data to establish its GWP limits. Different EPD PCRs are used in different parts of the world. Comparisons require that the same PCR be used to develop all EPDs being compared. This approach will ensure the same inputs, emissions and actions are being consistently applied.

GSA accordingly determined that North American PCRs are most applicable to its procurements, and the Compliance Documentation criteria in GSA’s IRA LEC material requirements specify acceptable PCRs.

14. Why do the steel requirements still show “TBD” for some steel products?

GSA has found insufficient EPDs available representing materials made via integrated steel mills to establish GWP limits for certain products at this time. When adequate data (e.g., from EPDs that meet IRA LEC steel “Compliance Documentation” requirements) is available for material made via integrated steel mills, it may be possible to identify numeric limits for substantially lower embodied carbon, compared to industry averages for relevant material/product categories. GSA will continue to collaborate with interagency partners and relevant stakeholders to understand the GWP and emissions reduction opportunities to decarbonize the manufacturing processes of all steel products to support American workers, industry competitiveness, and national security considerations.

15. Why may GSA establish separate GWP limits for integrated mill and electric arc furnace — also called EAF — steel production methods if/when adequate data is available?*

Opportunities for improvement exist throughout the steel industry. Establishing GWP limits for products produced by multiple manufacturing processes will promote innovation throughout the industry, support American workers, lower emissions from all processes and help catalyze broad-based industrial decarbonization.

According to the U.S. Department of Energy Pathways to Commercial Liftoff reports, the U.S. has seen production shift from blast furnaces to EAFs. EAFs now account for ~70% of domestic steel, and are less carbon-intensive. DOE recognizes that this trend will continue, but will face increased resource constraints (e.g., limited domestic prime scrap availability). Currently, some critical grades of steel cannot be made using EAFs. For these reasons among others, DOE is working to support a diversity of technologies to continue to decarbonize all production pathways for steel.

Similarly, current market research suggests it is unlikely for material made from one manufacturing process alone to meet 100% of the demand for steel over time. For example, the International Energy Agency October 2020 Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap [PDF] states that: “[S]crap cannot fulfill the sector’s raw material input requirements alone because steel production today is higher than when the products that are currently being recycled were produced. This means that recycling alone cannot be relied upon to reduce emissions from the sector to the extent needed to meet climate goals.”

According to the Congressional Research Service’s May 2022 Domestic Steel Manufacturing: Overview and Prospects [PDF] report, “Integrated steelmaking is inherently more difficult to decarbonize than EAF steelmaking, largely due to the use of blast furnaces to reduce iron ore to elemental iron.” Similarly, the American Iron and Steel Institute’s Steel Technology Glossary definition for Integrated Mills notes that “the differing technological approaches to molten steel [integrated mills and minimills] imply different scale efficiencies and, therefore, separate management styles, labor relations, and product markets.”

There is precedent for considering steel manufacturing processes separately to support manufacturing decarbonization. Although not governing the separate GWP limit question, an example of an instance where manufacturing processes are treated differently can be found in the EPA IRA Interim Determination [PDF]. That document requires ENERGY STAR Energy Performance Score reporting for “steel produced in an integrated steel (not an electric arc furnace) mill.” EPA has only published an ENERGY STAR Energy Performance Indicator, or EPI, that is specific to integrated mills.

The ENERGY STAR Integrated Steel Mill EPI [PDF] “score[s] individual steel mills’ energy performance based on a comparison of a plant to the entire integrated steel industry in the U.S. and Canada.” (Emphasis added.) This EPI does not compare the plant-level energy efficiency of integrated mills against that of EAFs, due to their dissimilar manufacturing processes.

Facilitating more sustainable steel production — including where substantial decarbonization opportunities exist — will enable all manufacturing processes to reduce emissions, creating a more competitive and sustainable American industry in the long run.

GSA’s requirements may be adjusted based on industry innovations, including steel PCR updates.

If a steel product has higher (or lower) “cradle to factory gate” emissions due to the nature of its manufacturing process, source materials, etc., its EPD-reported GWP numbers will speak for themselves. This is because the North American steel industry uses one PCR framework1 to account for “cradle to factory gate” emissions across almost all steel product types and manufacturing processes.

Data sources

16. What data sources did GSA use?

EPA’s Interim Determination states “Agencies shall estimate the GWP at the 20th and 40th percentiles and the industry average, as needed, for each material/product category using data from a verified source (e.g., an open source EPD database2, industrywide EPDs or a 3rd party-verified LCA developed using the relevant PCR).”

GSA’s GWP limits were developed based on industry average EPDs and actual products’ publicly-available EPD data, filtered by material type, PCR(s) specified in GSA’s requirements, North American geographical scope and current validity.

17. What if publicly-available EPD data contains errors?

GSA seeks the most reliable available data, and leverages aggregated information from third-party-verified EPDs.

GSA and other Federal agencies encourage digitized EPD submission and automated quality control processes, which can improve data quality and more quickly identify potential anomalies.

18. Is there a government-run EPD database for Federal agencies to use?*

Not currently. EPA’s RFI to Support New [IRA] Programs to Lower Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions Associated with Construction Materials and Products collected comments on topics including ways to improve background datasets, how to improve PCRs and EPDs to better-inform public agencies’ decisions, labeling opportunities, and how EPA grants or cooperative agreements may help develop national PCR and EPD repositories.

EPA’s RFI was built on findings from GSA’s prior RFIs and industry feedback. It helped shape EPA’s IRA Section 60112 Environmental Product Declaration Assistance and Section 60116 Carbon Labeling programs. The EPD assistance program is detailed in the following answer, and EPA may support improvements to repositories of data that goes into EPDs, such as the Federal Life Cycle Assessment, or LCA, Commons.

19. Is support available to help develop EPDs?*

GSA cannot directly pay for EPD development. GSA generally awards construction contracts on a firm-fixed price basis; such pricing allocates responsibility for cost recovery to the business judgment of the prime contractor. Prime contractors commonly include overhead (e.g. research, development, documentation, and compliance costs) and supplier/subcontractor costs in their overall pricing.

IRA Section 60112 appropriated $250 million to EPA for EPD Assistance, and EPA hosted a March 2023 webinar on Grants and Technical Assistance for Environmental Product Declarations.

In September 2023, EPA posted a notice of funding opportunity for the aforementioned grant program. Find information on EPA’s Reducing Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Construction Materials and Products EPD assistance grant program. The application deadline is January 16, 2024.

Other trade associations of nonprofit groups may be willing to support EPD development. For example, the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association has expressed interest in helping smaller concrete companies obtain EPDs where cost, staffing, or tools may be barriers to entry for the growing market for EPD-documented low-carbon materials. Other public or private initiatives may be available now or in the future.

Whole-building

20. Will GSA’s project teams use more asphalt, concrete, glass and steel in project designs, instead of other materials, since IRA funding initially only covers these four?*

GSA reviewed existing project portfolio-wide needs for how best to leverage the IRA funding for the four materials, including smaller-scale projects such as parking lot refurbishments or window replacements that (a) may require IRA-eligible materials, and (b) can be obligated by the statutory deadline of September 30, 2026. This investment strategy was publicly announced November 6, 2023.

GSA’s new construction and major modernization projects also use whole-building life cycle assessment to promote right-sizing of materials, consider low-carbon alternatives across material types (including beyond these four initial key materials allowed under EPA’s IRA Interim Determination), and factor in material durability and ease of maintenance.

GSA’s IRA project selections center predominantly on existing well-defined project needs from GSA’s deferred maintenance backlog, and in support of the Federal building efficiency goals. IRA funding can be used to assist an existing project’s scope to enhance its overall sustainability impact, including by specifying lower-carbon materials.

GSA’s Green Proving Ground, or GPG, program is also currently evaluating a low-carbon precast concrete product. Within IRA, GSA looks forward to exploring more opportunities to implement proven, commercially-available innovative materials, products, and processes.

21. Can materials’ long-term operational carbon impacts be considered, in addition to their upfront embodied carbon?

EPA’s Interim Determination notes that “EPA is prioritizing the production stage in this interim determination due to data availability in EPDs and production’s outsized embodied greenhouse gas emissions impact when compared to the use and disposal stages of the construction product lifecycle.”

IRA Sections 60502 and 60504 appropriate funding to GSA for high-performance green buildings, and emerging and sustainable technologies, respectively. Work funded under those sections may save energy and reduce operational carbon emissions.

P100 1.9.2.9 [PDF - 12 MB] requires the agency’s new construction and major modernization projects (including IRA-funded work) design to achieve 20% lower whole-building embodied carbon, compared to a modeled standard code-compliant baseline building, using whole-building life cycle assessment. This requires GSA’s design teams to consider both operational and embodied carbon, material selections, and “right-sizing” the amount of material.

GSA reports its operational carbon quantities and trends annually, and pursues Federal operational decarbonization goals, such as a net-zero emissions building portfolio by 2045.3

Materials

22. Will additional IRA-eligible material categories be added?*

TBD. GSA is coordinating with U.S. EPA potentially broadening the types of construction materials that GSA’s IRA 60503 funding can be used on. Such a change would help GSA meet its needs for interior renovation materials that can help right-size the Federal building portfolio and save money.

23. Can GSA use low embodied carbon cement instead of concrete?*

Where provision of concrete that qualifies under GSA’s IRA concrete limits is practical, GSA’s IRA concrete limits must be used.

Where provision of concrete that qualifies under GSA IRA concrete limits is impractical, GSA’s IRA limits for cement may be applied to the cement being used in the concrete mix.

24. How is GSA addressing LEC materials for window systems? What qualifies for low embodied carbon funding and what doesn’t?*

The Insulated Glazing Unit, or IGU, will qualify as an assembly if 80% of the IGU (by weight or by cost) is comprised of qualifying flat glass. Qualifying related necessary expenses include directly-related demolition and abatement work, design, commissioning, and necessary infrastructure components.

For purposes of the calculation, the glazing assembly on curtain wall, storefront, or punch window conditions includes only the assembly components of the glazing unit (e.g., an IGU or laminated glazing unit). Glazing assembly components include flat glass lites, any laminate interlayers (e.g., PVB), any fritting or internal IGU shading components, spacer and created airspace, desiccant, and perimeter edge seals.

Assembly components exclude adjacent materials from the glazing unit assembly calculation, such as window sashes and framing, gaskets, sealants, seals, air vapor barrier, and structural connections. Those adjacent materials may be covered as expenses necessary to acquire and install approved products, materials, and assemblies.

25. What did GSA learn about the origin of the products and materials procured? Were they all compliant with the Buy American and Trade Agreements Acts?*

To date, all LEC materials acquired under the pilot program have complied with applicable laws and regulations concerning domestic sourcing and trade agreements. GSA contractors are obligated to comply with FAR 52.225-9, Buy American-Construction Materials or FAR 52.225-11 Buy American-Construction Materials under Trade Agreements, as applicable. Incidents of noncompliance are handled in accordance with FAR 25.206.

For example, GSA’s first procurement obligated under the pilot went to windows made in Pennsylvania for the Lewis F. Powell, Jr. U.S. Courthouse project.

26. Can unfabricated source materials qualify for GSA IRA funding?

Yes. GSA has added GWP limits for four unfabricated steel categories per industry input.

Additionally, construction product assemblies (such as processed glass or insulating glass units fabricated from flat glass) can qualify for IRA funding if at least 80% of the assembly’s total cost or total weight comprises materials that meet these requirements.

27. How will GSA verify whether contractors used the materials identified in the project’s design?

GSA’s contracts will require that vendors provide submittals during design and construction, including quantities of qualifying materials, and product-specific EPDs.

In addition to Government monitoring, construction managers and commissioning providers will also be required to verify and report whether: (a) submitted EPDs comply with design specifications for IRA-qualifying materials; (b) reported quantity was accurate; and (c) reported IRA-qualifying materials were actually installed.


Footnotes

1 GSA’s steel compliance documentation criteria specify that EPDs in all steel subcategories must use the same industry-accepted PCR: UL’s PCR Guidance for Building-Related Products and Services, Part B: Designated Steel Construction Product EPD Requirements.
2 EPA has clarified to GSA that the phrase “open source EPD database” in the Interim Determination was intended to provide an example of a suitable verified source platform, not to require use of open sources for which underlying code is available, nor to restrict agencies’ use of other kinds of free-to-use, open EPD data platforms.
3 Executive Order 14057 [PDF] also seeks to mitigate the U.S. government’s operational and embodied carbon impacts, stating that “Agencies shall reduce emissions, promote environmental stewardship, support resilient supply chains, drive innovation, and incentivize markets for sustainable products and services by … maximizing environmental benefits and cost savings through use of full lifecycle cost methodologies; [and by] purchasing products that contain recycled content, are biobased, or are energy and water efficient ….” Exec. Order 14057 Section 208 (2021).

Print Page Print this page Email Page
Last updated: May 13, 2025
Top
    • Overview
    • E&ST program details
    • LEC program details
      • Low-embodied carbon projects
      • Material requirements
      • Material requirements FAQs
      • Program updates
    • HPB program details

Home

  • Resources for …
    • Americans with Disabilities
    • Citizens and Consumers
    • Federal Employees
    • GSA Employees
    • Native American affairs
    • Presidential & Congressional Commissions, Boards or Small Agencies
    • Small Business
  • Governmentwide Initiatives
    • Centers of Excellence
    • Digital experience
    • Emergency response
    • Federal Cybersecurity
    • ID, Credentials, and Access Management
    • Information Quality
    • Open Data
    • Technology Modernization Fund
  • Contact Us
  • Organization
    • Leadership Directory
    • Staff Directory
  • References
    • Annual reports
    • Plain Language
    • Budget and Performance
    • Catalogs
    • Orders & Directives
    • Forms
  • Website Information
    • Accessibility statement
    • A-Z Index
    • Report a website issue
    • Sitemap
  • Also of Interest
    • Data.gov
    • Whitehouse.gov
  • Tools
    • eBuy
    • eLibrary
    • Contracting forecast tool
    • GSA Advantage
    • GSA Auctions
GSA logo
  • Facebook Facebook
  • X X
  • LinkedIn LinkedIn
  • YouTube YouTube
  • instagram Instagram
  • Blog Blog
  • email Email

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

GSA.gov

An official website of the U.S. General Services Administration

  • Accessibility statement
  • Website Policies
  • Reports
  • Office of the Inspector General
  • No FEAR Act
  • FOIA Requests
  • Board of Contract Appeals
Looking for U.S. government information and services?
Visit USA.gov

PER DIEM LOOK-UP

1 Choose a location

Error, The Per Diem API is not responding. Please try again later.

No results could be found for the location you've entered.

Get my location

OR

OR

Rates for Alaska, Hawaii, and U.S. territories and possessions are set by the Department of Defense.

Rates for foreign countries are set by the Department of State.

2 Choose a date


OR

Rates are available between 10/1/2022 and 09/30/2025.

The End Date of your trip can not occur before the Start Date.

 
 
Additional terms and conditions

Traveler reimbursement is based on the location of the work activities and not the accommodations, unless lodging is not available at the work activity, then the agency may authorize the rate where lodging is obtained.

Unless otherwise specified, the per diem locality is defined as "all locations within, or entirely surrounded by, the corporate limits of the key city, including independent entities located within those boundaries."

Per diem localities with county definitions shall include"all locations within, or entirely surrounded by, the corporate limits of the key city as well as the boundaries of the listed counties, including independent entities located within the boundaries of the key city and the listed counties (unless otherwise listed separately)."

When a military installation or Government - related facility(whether or not specifically named) is located partially within more than one city or county boundary, the applicable per diem rate for the entire installation or facility is the higher of the rates which apply to the cities and / or counties, even though part(s) of such activities may be located outside the defined per diem locality.